The types of milk available at grocery stores and in coffee shops has been increasing in the last 10 years. What used to be just low fat cows milk and 2%, has now become almond, oat, soy, cashew and coconut milk. The options are only increasing. This may be due to a combination of reasons including the rise in veganism or awareness of animal treatment in factory farms or in the rise of self-reported lactose intolerance.
Lactose is digested by
the lactase enzyme in the small intestine. This enzyme is typically only
present in infancy to allow proper absorption of breast milk. The enzyme
typically degenerates and stops being expressed as the individual gets older
and no longer requires breast milk (Jansson-Knodell et al., 2020. However, with
the domestication of cows humans continued to have a intake of lactose into
adulthood and we have observed a persistence of lactase expression into
adulthood. It is still unclear exactly how and why this has occurred.
To begin there are two ways
people might interpret lactose ingestion. First, lactose intolerance requires
clinical diagnosis of reduced or lack of the lactase enzyme at the intestinal boarder
(Jansson-Knodell et al., 2020). Lactose maldigestion is subjective to the
individual by reporting gastrointestinal discomfort post-lactose ingestion (Jansson-Knodell
et al., 2020). Typically, lactose intolerance is diagnosed via a positive lactose
hydrogen breath test (LHBT) and maldigestion is self-reported symptoms to the ingestion
of lactose. In a study done in 2021, a double-blind procedure was conducted on
42 individuals who were a mix of lactose intolerant and maldigesters (Carroccio et al., 2021). The researchers found that many lactose
tolerant (present lactase enzyme/negative LHBT) individuals presented with GI
discomfort post-lactose ingestion suggesting that there is something other than
lactose in cow’s milk that individuals are responding to (Carroccio et al., 2021).
In another study
looking at the contents of milk that may be increasing GI discomfort after
ingestion of cow’s milk, leading to self-reported lactose intolerance, response
to the ingestion of two proteins common to cow’s milk A1 and A2 beta-casein were
recorded (Jianqin et al., 2015). They concluded that consumption of A1
beta-casein had a higher chance of GI inflammation, post-dairy digestive
discomfort (PD3), and reduce speed and accuracy of cognitive processing compared
to consumption of only A2 beta-casein (Jianqin et al., 2015). None
of these symptoms were reported in consumption of only A2 beta-casein type cow’s
milk (Jianqin et al., 2015).
So, if you are someone
who has self-reported lactose intolerance, maybe it is not the lactose but a
different protein present in milk that your GI tract is having an increased
immune response to or having difficulty responding to.
Carroccio A, Soresi M,
Mantia B, Fayer F, La Blasca F, Seidita A, D’Alcamo A, Florena AM, Tinè C,
Garlisi C, Mansueto P. Whole Cow’s Milk but Not Lactose Can Induce Symptoms in Patients
with Self-Reported Milk Intolerance: Evidence of Cow’s Milk Sensitivity in
Adults. Nutrients. 2021; 13(11):3833. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13113833
Jansson-Knodell C. L., Krajicek
E. J., Savaiano D. A., Shin A. S., Lactose Intolerance: A Concise Review to
Skim the Surface, Mayo Clinic Proceedings 95, 7 (2020), Pages 1499-1505, ISSN
0025-6196, ttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.04.036.
Jianqin, S., Leiming,
X., Lu, X. et al. Effects of milk containing only A2 beta casein
versus milk containing both A1 and A2 beta casein proteins on gastrointestinal
physiology, symptoms of discomfort, and cognitive behavior of people with
self-reported intolerance to traditional cows’ milk. Nutr J 15,
35 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-016-0147-z
Mila, this was a really interesting post. I have also observed the growing movement towards alternative forms of milk and it made me wonder if they were actually valid replacements to dairy. Milk consumption provides individuals with a host of vitamins and minerals, including calcium, vitamin B2, vitamin B12, potassium, and phosphorus. It is composed of 87% water and 13% macromolecules, vitamins, and minerals. However, there is some controversy as to whether milk is the best method of obtaining these nutrients. Although dairy milk seems to possess both benefits and harms, I'm more interested in understanding its similarity to milk alternatives. It seems that plant based milk is in the process of being renamed due to its misleading title, considering its not actually a form of milk at all. It seems as if these diary alternatives have fewer calories, sugars, and saturated fats. However, they are also lower in important macromolecules, such as protein. Meaning, plant based milk is not as nutritionally fulfilling. Overall, I think it would be interesting to create a more nutrient dense milk replica that would allow lactose-intolerant populations to still get the benefits of milk without the painful side effects.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/milk/
Lactose intolerance is a weird disorder since it depends a lot on the genetic and external factors of an affected individuals. For example, while females and males are affected by the condition equally, up to 45 percent of affected female will gain the ability to digest lactose during pregnancy, which makes sense since pregnant moms need a lot of glucose to fuel both hers and the fetus' energy requirements. Additionally, race and ethnicity also play a major role in the presence of lactose intolerance, with 90 to 100 percent of asians have the disorder, 40 to 55 for Northern European,... Secondary lactose intolerance could also be acquired due to a reduce in the enzyme activity in response to damages to the intestinal tracts, such as bacterial overgrowth, Crohn's disease, viral infections, celiac diseases,...
ReplyDeleteRusynyk, R. & Still, C. (2001). Lactose intolerance. Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, 101(s41), 10-12. https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2001.20015